| To: | Michael Iatrou <m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e1000 (?) jumbo frames performance issue |
| From: | Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 06 May 2005 09:18:59 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200505060055.55778.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200505051928.32496.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> <427A7F5B.8050704@xxxxxx> <200505060055.55778.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; HP-UX 9000/785; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304 |
It might be good to add CPU utilization figures - for 2.3pl1 that means editing the makefile to add a -DUSE_PROC_STAT and recompiling. Or you can grab netperf 2.4.0-rc3 from: ftp://ftp.cup.hp.com/dist/networking/benchmarks/netperf/experimental/ if you cannot find it elsewhere, and that will (try to) compile-in the right CPU utilization mechanism automagically.I already did a custom CPU usage instrumentation (based on infos from /proc/stat -- the latest netperf does the same thing, doesn't it?) and it seems that system has plenty of idle time (up to 50% if I recall correct) IIRC you stated that the boxes were UP?If changing netperf settings didn't affect much, then kernel profiles and/or packet traces may be in order. rick |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TG3]: Add tagged status support, Arthur Kepner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch linux-2.6.12-rc3-mm3 1/7] r8169: de-obfuscate supported PCI ID, Francois Romieu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e1000 (?) jumbo frames performance issue, Michael Iatrou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ip route del bug?, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |