| To: | Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: e1000 (?) jumbo frames performance issue |
| From: | Michael Iatrou <m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 6 May 2005 01:26:09 +0300 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200505060055.55778.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200505051928.32496.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> <427A7F5B.8050704@xxxxxx> <200505060055.55778.m.iatrou@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.8 |
When the date was Friday 06 May 2005 00:55, Michael Iatrou wrote: > > You could try some tests adding a test-specific -D to > > disable Nagle, or -C to set TCP_CORK, or use -m to set the send size to > > say, 32KB. > > I 've already tested -m 32KB and its the same as 16KB. > I will try -D and -C too. Done, (almost) nothing changed. -- Michael Iatrou Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept. University of Patras, Greece |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: resend patch: xfrm policybyid, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MultiPath Routing, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: e1000 (?) jumbo frames performance issue, Michael Iatrou |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e1000 (?) jumbo frames performance issue, Rick Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |