netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded

from [Anton Blanchard] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 18:36:59 +1000
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050506011954.18176751.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050504230731.12be1bc3.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050506043653.GD8255@krispykreme> <20050506054516.GE8255@krispykreme> <20050505231345.4296d9b5.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050506071005.GG8255@krispykreme> <20050506011954.18176751.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i 
 
> > eth0 data: 66 frags: 2892 4
> 
> What does this "66 frags" mean?  Is it "tso_segs" from
> the SKB?  skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags can never be that
> large (MAX_SKB_FRAGS is (65536/PAGE_SIZE + 2)) so it
> can't be that.

Nah I just dump the skb mapping then the subsequent frags. So 66 is the
size of the header. In this case there is only 2 frags.

Anton
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: resend patch: xfrm policybyid, Herbert Xu
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, John Heffner
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]