| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 May 2005 16:16:10 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050505162448.3278aa8f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050504230731.12be1bc3.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050505153532.30159bd5.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050505162448.3278aa8f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 5 May 2005 16:24:48 -0700 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 5 May 2005 15:35:32 -0700 > "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Is anyone testing this or is everyone too scared? :-) > > > > A lot of people wanted this TSO stuff fixed, so I spent > > time implementing the fix. Yet nobody seems interested > > enough to even say "it works" or "it's busted" :-/ > > It works on tg3 that is too stupid to do TSO at least. More tests coming It's off by default, "ethtool -K eth0 tso on" is necessary. I'll change that soon. Or do you have a chip revision that really can't do TSO? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RFC ethtool usage, Don Fry |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, Nivedita Singhvi |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [PATCH] TSO Reloaded, Leonid Grossman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |