Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm

netdev

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatch

To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatch
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 3 May 2005 14:25:15 -0700
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20050501184731.GJ577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20050501184731.GJ577@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Sun, 1 May 2005 20:47:31 +0200
Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Makes the type > XFRM_MSG_MAX check behave correctly to
> protect access to xfrm_dispatch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks Thomas.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatch, Thomas Graf Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatch, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	Fw: [Bug 4554] New: /proc/net/route missing info for 127.0.0.1/8, Stephen Hemminger
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2/2] [XFRM] Cleanup xfrm_msg_min and xfrm_dispatch, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH 1/2] [XFRM] Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatch, Thomas Graf
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 2/2] [XFRM] Cleanup xfrm_msg_min and xfrm_dispatch, Thomas Graf
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]