| To: | Miika Komu <miika@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPsec performance |
| From: | Dave Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 03 May 2005 15:27:41 -0400 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505031913020.9502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022117190.25766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022204090.25766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505030248020.26815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505030820160.24686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115099678.2953.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505030943310.247@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115129839.2953.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505031913020.9502@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 19:14 +0300, Miika Komu wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dave Dillow wrote: > > 3DES is processor intensive. I'd say 1.9MB/s is reasonable for the > > hardware you are on. > > Ok. Thanks for your quick responses! I should note that I mean reasonable given the current implementation -- you're seeing performance in line with numbers on other machines. I think it's been mentioned that our 3DES implementation has not been tuned for x86, so there's probably some performance being left on the floor. I could be wrong, though. -- Dave Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: icmp_unreachable uses wrong ip, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPsec performance, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance, Miika Komu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |