| To: | Dave Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPsec performance |
| From: | Miika Komu <miika@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 3 May 2005 19:14:05 +0300 (EEST) |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <1115129839.2953.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022117190.25766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505022204090.25766@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0505030248020.26815@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505030820160.24686@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115099678.2953.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0505030943310.247@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1115129839.2953.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dave Dillow wrote: > On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 09:44 +0300, Miika Komu wrote: > > On Tue, 3 May 2005, Dave Dillow wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 08:25 +0300, Miika Komu wrote: > > > > However, this does explain why I got only 1.9 megabytes/s with 3DES. > > > > > > What was your hardware? Without knowing what you're running on, it's > > > impossible to tell if that is good or bad. > > > > > > Linux Journal was getting ~5.5MB/s on a PIV 2.2GHz. > > > I get ~2.1MB/s on a 550MHz Athlon. > > > > Intel Pentium III 500 MHz > > 3DES is processor intensive. I'd say 1.9MB/s is reasonable for the > hardware you are on. Ok. Thanks for your quick responses! -- Miika Komu miika@xxxxxx http://www.iki.fi/miika/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] dynamic wep keys for airo.c, Benjamin Reed |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [PATCH] s2io: replace readq() with mmiowb() in s2io_xmit(), Ramkrishna Vepa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance, Dave Dillow |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPsec performance, Dave Dillow |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |