Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock

netdev

Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock

To:	Mark Broadbent <markb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock
From:	Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 30 Apr 2005 01:37:55 +0100
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<E1DRFqC-00028H-Qi@tigger>
References:	<E1DRFqC-00028H-Qi@tigger>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Iau, 2005-04-28 at 21:42, Mark Broadbent wrote:
> The interrupt handling code in the tulip network driver appears to use a non 
> IRQ safe spinlock in an interrupt context.  The following patch should 
> correct 
> this.

In what situations is this code path executed outside the IRQ handler ?

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Mark Broadbent Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Herbert Xu Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Sergey Vlasov Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Francois Romieu Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Herbert Xu Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Alan Cox <= Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Herbert Xu

Previous by Date:	Re: patch2: del/get byid, jamal
Next by Date:	Re: Pktgen receive hook in dev.c?, jamal
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Herbert Xu
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Herbert Xu
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]