netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: patch: policy update by id

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: patch: policy update by id
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:20:45 +1000
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1114658160.7663.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1114604826.7670.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050427233924.GA22238@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114650816.7663.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428012135.GA22950@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428013014.GA23043@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114653140.7663.36.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428020754.GA23326@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050427194356.58a3e618.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050428025644.GA23823@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1114658160.7663.102.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 11:16:00PM -0400, jamal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-28-04 at 12:56 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> 
> > Well netfilter certainly follows this scheme:
> > 
> > $ iptables -I INPUT -s 3.3.3.3 -d 4.4.4.4 -j ACCEPT
> > $ iptables -I INPUT -s 3.3.3.3 -d 4.4.4.4 -j ACCEPT
> > $ iptables -v -L INPUT -n
> > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> >  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source               
> > destination 
> >     0     0 ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       3.3.3.3              4.4.4.4 
> >     
> >     0     0 ACCEPT     all  --  *      *       3.3.3.3              4.4.4.4 
> >     
> 
> Which is bizare to say the least. If you delete, only the first one gets
> deleted.

It isn't that strange.  It's also done using indices except that the
indices aren't fixed.  Do delete the second rule you would say

iptables -D INPUT 2
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>