netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem

from [jamal] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Arthur Kepner <akepner@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 07:41:07 -0400
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ak@xxxxxx, gnb@xxxxxxx, jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504241845070.2934@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: unknown
References: <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C03A633C7@orsmsx408> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504180943290.15052@xxxxxxxxxx> <1113855967.7436.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050419055535.GA12211@xxxxxxx> <m1hdhzyrdz.fsf@xxxxxx> <1114173195.7679.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050422172108.GA10598@xxxxxx> <1114193902.7978.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050422183004.GC10598@xxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504221131350.15052@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050422115230.6037a362.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504241845070.2934@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
Actually, it may be sufficient to collect data for 20, 40, and 80% link
utilization for napi, napi+dmiller_mchan and nonapi

Same for the e1000.

cheers,
jamal
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] bonding: partially back out dev_set_mac_address, Herbert Xu
Next by Date:  Incorrect permissions on route flush sysctl, Dave Jones
Previous by Thread:  Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, Jamal Hadi Salim
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]