[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 15:21:29 -0400
Cc: ak@xxxxxx, gnb@xxxxxxx, akepner@xxxxxxx, jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050422120714.35f56e76.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: unknown
References: <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C03A633C7@orsmsx408> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504180943290.15052@xxxxxxxxxx> <1113855967.7436.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050419055535.GA12211@xxxxxxx> <m1hdhzyrdz.fsf@xxxxxx> <1114173195.7679.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050422172108.GA10598@xxxxxx> <1114193902.7978.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050422183004.GC10598@xxxxxx> <1114196487.7978.65.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050422120714.35f56e76.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2005-22-04 at 12:07 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:

> Let's get people testing changes like that to see if it undoes
> the bad cases.  I want to do something proactive with these
> reports instead of just asking for more performance data like
> a bunch of crazed lunatics :-)

But we are crazed lunatics ;->
I have a feeling that the patch will solve the problem and we wont have
the fun of seeing interesting data.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>