| To: | "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH net-drivers-2.6 5/6] e100: Performance optimizations to e100 Tx Path |
| From: | Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:17:56 -0700 |
| Cc: | "Chilakala, Mallikarjuna" <mallikarjuna.chilakala@xxxxxxxxx>, "Venkatesan, Ganesh" <ganesh.venkatesan@xxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C03B1A474@orsmsx408> |
| References: | <C925F8B43D79CC49ACD0601FB68FF50C03B1A474@orsmsx408> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Apr 21, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote: Where is this 256us delay coming from?Turning off the 'I' bit allows the transmit interrupt moderation to come on, and setting the cid (which was already set) to all 1's indicates themax delay (256 us) This makes sense. I forgot about the cid delay. I was afraid the "CPU Saver" microcode was coming back. Thanks Jesse. -scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [PATCH net-drivers-2.6 5/6] e100: Performance optimizations to e100 Tx Path, Brandeburg, Jesse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | BUG: HTB?, Asim Shankar |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [PATCH net-drivers-2.6 5/6] e100: Performance optimizations to e100 Tx Path, Brandeburg, Jesse |
| Next by Thread: | [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sk98lin/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |