| To: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h |
| From: | Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:42:39 -0400 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050419235646.GY5489@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050419012935.GQ5489@xxxxxxxxx> <20050419135648.GC7315@xxxxxxxxx> <20050419235646.GY5489@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:56:46AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Where does my patch do this?
> Only the one actually used function setup_ee_mem_bitbanger is moved to
> ns83820.c .
Which is dead code if you have removed the other users of the data
structure it initialized. Please try to understand the intent of the
code being cleaned up instead of just blindly deleting things, and be
thorough.
-ben
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h, Adrian Bunk |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Must every packet have a creating socket? (was Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?), Park Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.6 patch] kill include/linux/eeprom.h, Adrian Bunk |
| Next by Thread: | 2.6.12-rc2-mm3: hostap: do not #include .c files, Adrian Bunk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |