| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it? |
| From: | Park Lee <parklee_sel@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:03:47 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Comment: | DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=vMOL9SsWhJe4C5ywawWRqtW5hY76yTE/opZ3Ggzsd+bxKTuUzXGJGxfE+L6pYk1X5lc7Oe3cFSsv3NdpimmVOeC/SkeCMNhB1kzCvdo0TdFWGrk9At/0UbhYat8xSU9+BhoOWHcMz0KukW1zQyOjF0m4K6kAP0ftpQrp4xm5Q3s= ; |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 at 08:03, jamal wrote:
> simple answer: no
Thank you very much.
Still, Does a forwarded packet also have no any kernel
socket with it? i.e. Is a forwarded packet not
associated with any socket at all?
When the forwarded packet arrived at its destination
machine, is there any socket associated with the
packet on the destination machine?
Thanks again.
Best Regards,
Park Lee
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Plan great trips with Yahoo! Travel: Now over 17,000 guides!
http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] QoS: frg queue (was [RFC] QoS: new per flow queue), jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: unregister_netdevice(): negative refcnt, suggest patch against 2.6.11, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Does a forwarded packet has a local socket with it?, Masoud Sharbiani |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |