| To: | Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/wan/: possible cleanups |
| From: | Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:55:06 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050417234738.GY3625@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050327143418.GE4285@xxxxxxxxx> <1111941516.14877.325.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050414232028.GD20400@xxxxxxxxx> <1113587392.11155.33.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050417234738.GY3625@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Llu, 2005-04-18 at 00:47, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Are there any external drivers using these exports, and if there are, > why aren't they in the kernel? Its a standard API > If there aren't and someone will at some time in the future need them, > re-adding the exports will be trivial. Really, you will spotaneously magically make them appear in old kernels that end users have just like that ? Your argument doesn't hold water. Its an API for drivers so that people can add 85x30 card drivers using DMA in this fashion. Its an API so they can add them to *EXISTING* kernels without users being forced to recompile/wait for the vendor to update their tree/upgrade to a new release. Alan |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: NAPI, e100, and system performance problem, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] QoS: frg queue (was [RFC] QoS: new per flow queue), jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/wan/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk |
| Next by Thread: | [2.6 patch] drivers/net/wan/: possible cleanups, Adrian Bunk |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |