On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 07:46:16PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > > HTB also needs to be fixed. Destruction is usually defered by the > refcnt until ->put(), htb_put() doesn't lock the tree. Same for > HFSC and CBQ. Yes you're absolutely right. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ACPI/HT or Packet Scheduler BUG?, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] prism54: fix printk format warnings, Luis R. Rodriguez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ACPI/HT or Packet Scheduler BUG?, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ACPI/HT or Packet Scheduler BUG?, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |