[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff

To: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (David S. Miller)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Too aggressive cwnd backoff
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 07:42:18 +1000
Cc: baruch@xxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050407113351.17f8c094.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Core
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.27-hx-1-686-smp (i686))
David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't disagree with your analysis at all.  I just want to find out
> if it did change in the vanilla sources.  Because if it did we can
> track down a changelog message and perhaps learn something about what
> the code is the way it is.

Looking at the vger tree this was introduced back in 2000:

# ChangeSet
#   2000/08/09 11:59:05-00:00 davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
#   Many files:
#     Merge in ANKs net-000808-23:20 patch.
#     Linus better eat this.

Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>