| To: | Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] bonding: partially back out dev_set_mac_address |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:57:56 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200504072055.j37KtXDf003795@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050407133151.5887c946.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200504072055.j37KtXDf003795@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:55:33 -0700 Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Another alternative would be to change the rtnetlink handler to > not use a sleepable memory allocation, e.g., ... > My presumption is that the above would be unacceptable, if for > no other reason than other notifiers could be attached that also make > sleepable memory allocations. You could change it instead to just use gfp_any(). Would that work? The problematic case occurs from softirq not hardirq right? |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] bonding: partially back out dev_set_mac_address, Jay Vosburgh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: atomic_dec_and_test for child dst needed in dst_destroy?, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] bonding: partially back out dev_set_mac_address, Jay Vosburgh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2] bonding: partially back out dev_set_mac_address, Jay Vosburgh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |