Hi Thomas Graf,
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:52:37 +0200, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > When linux's QoS control capability is widely used, such web interface
> > sooner or later comes into being.
>
> That might be true but I will never ack on something that makes zero
> collision use of cls_fw impossible. I'm all for improving this but
> not at the cost of reduced performance for the most obvious use case
> of cls_fw.
Agree.
>
> > Your suggestion is very considerable. But that needs some more work. And,
> > isn't that some bloated?
>
> The shift + bitmask might be bloated and can be deferred a bit until
> someone comes up with this need. I can cook up a patch for this
> if you want, it's not much work.
I am glad that you are willing to help to hook them up. I really need
the new hashing way.
--
lark
|