netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Linux support for RDMA (was: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005

To: jaganav@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Linux support for RDMA (was: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics)
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 22:02:16 -0800
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, bmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050402052738.GA17506@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050401154348.553f3c46@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112405833.424df749e61b5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050402052738.GA17506@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:27:38PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:37:13PM -0500, jaganav@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 
> > Several RNIC adapter vendors, who contribute to the 
> > openRDMA effort, are quite willing to opensource 
> > their drivers through openRDMA project.
> 
> "Several"?  Why not all?
> 
> And why the dual license?  What good is writing Linux kernel code that
> is BSD licensed for such a core component?  Didn't you all learn from
> the openib licensing mess?

Oh, and for those of you who might not know what mess I am talking
about:

The openib code was set up to be dual GPL and BSD licensed for the
express purpose of taking the openib code and placing it into a closed
source operating system (not any of the *BSDs).  Needless to say, this
has prevented me from doing any openib work, and probably the same for a
number of other Linux kernel developers.

If you all wish to duplicate this stupidity, feel free, but do not
expect to get any help from the community...

thanks,

greg k-h

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>