netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Linux support for RDMA

To: jaganav@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Linux support for RDMA
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:57:22 -0800
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1112320148.424ca894f3c8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1112320148.424ca894f3c8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324)
jaganav@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

No doubt, Ethernet will eventually win .. btw, Hasn't history proven this over
ATM? More specifically when the industry predicted that ATM will replace
ethernet :)

However, I'll have to agree with Ben that IB technolgy will fill an important
niche segment, more specifically so in the low end of High Performance Computing
(HPC) segment which is in a transition mode currently moving away from
proprietary interconnects to industry standards based IB technology. Eventhough,
ethernet may eventually may catch up with IB in terms of the bandwidth but IB
fabrics can offer better latencies.


We've seen this over and over... Token Ring, FDDI, ATM, IB, ... all of them "better" than the Ethernet of the day, but eventually commoditization wins out. With 10GE, Ethernet has finally stopped pretending to be CSMA/CD even; "Ethernet" is now really nothing more than a collective name for a set of somewhat compatible commodity networking technologies.

        -hpa

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>