| To: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Redirect-Device |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 31 Mar 2005 19:53:14 -0500 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <424C8E2C.70302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <424C6089.1080507@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112303627.1073.71.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424C6B10.6030200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112306031.1073.109.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424C7813.4000101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050331143531.30f4eb8f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424C7F96.4070002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112311618.1090.20.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424C8E2C.70302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 18:56, Ben Greear wrote: > Our approaches to the problem are fundamentally different. The framework i described gives you the leggo to build the constructs you want. Its like building a house using bricks. If you decide that you need to build a house by moulding steel (because youve been using steel for 80 years dammit and it works) - its your call. OTOH, if you need help feel free to ask. Whether that code goes in is really up to Dave. cheers, jamal |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] netif_rx: receive path optimization, Rick Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] netif_rx: receive path optimization, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: Redirect-Device, Ben Greear |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: Redirect-Device, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |