| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics |
| From: | Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:39:01 -0500 (EST) |
| Cc: | Alex Aizman <itn780@xxxxxxxxx>, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'jamal'" <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Dmitry Yusupov'" <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, "'James Bottomley'" <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, "'netdev'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050331193444.GS24804@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050331114122.GL24804@xxxxxx> <20050331193444.GS24804@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Andi Kleen wrote: > This does not work, because any writable file system can be in theory > an OOM deadlock and would need to be resource protected. Just someone needs > to mmap a file on it and dirty enough pages in it to full up system > memory and make the system deadlock while trying to clean pages > to get free memory. You cannot fill up the mempools with dirty pages, which makes sure we don't deadlock. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: KERNEL: assertion (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) failed at net/netlink/af_netlink.c (126), Krzysztof Oledzki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |