Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events

[Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:00:36PM +1000, herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:55:59PM -0500, jamal wrote:
> > 
> > Any objection to still calling it (new name) struct xfrm_sa_cb but
> > with only one 32 bit value in it - namely data?
> > This way i could add any other thing in the future in it without
> > changing the function call paramaters.
> 
> That's fine by me.

Actually, could you rename it to km_state_cb? This information is
only used for communication with the the km and it should be marked
as such just like the other km_* identifiers.
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt