netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics

To: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:04:54 -0600
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@xxxxxxxxx>, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx, open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503301049440.28633@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050326224621.61f6d917.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503272245350.30885@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1zmwn21hk.fsf@xxxxxx> <1112027284.5531.27.camel@mulgrave> <20050329152008.GD63268@xxxxxx> <1112116762.5088.65.camel@beastie> <1112130512.1077.107.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050330152208.GB12672@xxxxxx> <20050330153313.GD32111@xxxxxxxxx> <20050330153948.GE12672@xxxxxx> <20050330154418.GE32111@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503301049440.28633@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 10:50 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Agreed, this is definately solvable.  If people don't agree,
> we should probably fight this out at the kernel summit. ;)

So just to make this explicit, we kill this thread and lobby for a topic
at the kernel summit discussing the problem of storage over net and the
ways of solving it.  Yes, I think that's a very good idea.

James



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>