| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:32:55 +1000 |
| Cc: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050330122321.GA10602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1111864971.1092.904.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050326194707.GA9872@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111867875.1089.915.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050327081848.GA13428@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111950449.1089.938.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050330004903.GA3399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1112184572.1089.80.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050330122321.GA10602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:23:21PM +1000, herbert wrote: > > For netlink it is important to use a different socket for receiving > multicast messages since otherwise you run the risk of losing unicast > messages when it overruns. This would work for PFKEY too since if we did this, we can simply remove the BROADCAST_ONE messages from the pfkey_* functions. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |