| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver |
| From: | Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:25:43 +0200 |
| Cc: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4249B52C.2000300@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200503290533.j2T5XEYT028850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4248FBFD.5000809@xxxxxxxxx> <20050328230830.5e90396f.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050329071002.GA16204@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050329152057.GA27840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4249B52C.2000300@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Tue, 29 March 2005 15:06:04 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Jörn Engel wrote: > > > >Just out of curiosity: why are there two mailing lists? Especially if > >one of them is the Wrong One. > > <shrug> > > linux-net is mostly dead. I get the impression it is occasionally used > by users. > > netdev (as, perhaps, the name implies) is where the network developers > hang out. Ok, I figured as much. But then, why is linux-net not just deleted? Bouncing mails would be an indication that noone will read them, right? Jörn -- There's nothing better for promoting creativity in a medium than making an audience feel "Hmm I could do better than that!" -- Douglas Adams in a slashdot interview |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Patch] net: fix build break when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set, Neil Horman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Patch] net: fix build break when CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not set, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |