| To: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Mar 2005 02:12:10 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050328230830.5e90396f.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200503290533.j2T5XEYT028850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4248FBFD.5000809@xxxxxxxxx> <20050328230830.5e90396f.akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 11:08:30PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > > ChangeSet 1.2231.1.122, 2005/03/28 19:50:29-08:00, richtera@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver
> > >
> > > Add support for claw network devices.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Grumpity grump grump grump. How tough is it to send new net drivers to
> > netdev and me for review?
>
> Was cc'ed to linux-net last Thursday, but it looks like the messages was
> too large and the vger server munched it.
This also brings up a larger question... why was a completely unreviewed
net driver merged?
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Andrew Morton |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Jörn Engel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver, Andrew Morton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |