netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:11:31 -0800
Cc: chas3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxx, linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050319230458.GB18495@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Open Source Development Lab
References: <20050316181532.GA3251@xxxxxxxxx> <200503172036.j2HKadfm000732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050319230458.GB18495@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 00:04:58 +0100
Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:36:40PM -0500, chas williams - CONTRACTOR wrote:
> > In message <20050316181532.GA3251@xxxxxxxxx>,Adrian Bunk writes:
> > >Letting CONFIG_BRIDGE depend on CONFIG_ATM doesn't sound like a good 
> > >idea, since I doubt all people using the Bridge code require ATM 
> > >support.
> > 
> > how about the following?
> >...
> 
> Looks good

Ditto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>