Re: Off-by-one bug at unix_mkname ?

[Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 28 2005 17:39, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:

>+               *      This may look like an off by one error but it is
>+               *      a bit more subtle. 108 is the longest valid AF_UNIX
>+               *      path for a binding. sun_path[108] doesnt as such
>+               *      exist. However in kernel space we are guaranteed that
>+               *      it is a valid memory location in our kernel
>+               *      address buffer.
>+               */

Now, does 2.6. _still_ guarantee that 108 is a valid offset?



Jan Engelhardt
-- 
No TOFU for me, please.