netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics

To: Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2005-discuss] Summary of 2005 Kernel Summit Proposed Topics
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:31:15 -0800
Cc: open-iscsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrea@xxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ksummit-2005-discuss@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4246FAD5.5080700@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4241D106.8050302@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050324101622S.fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111628393.1548.307.camel@beastie> <20050324113312W.fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111633846.1548.318.camel@beastie> <20050324215922.GT14202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424346FE.20704@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050324233921.GZ14202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050325034341.GV32638@xxxxxxxxx> <20050327035149.GD4053@xxxxxxxxx> <20050327054831.GA15453@xxxxxxxxx> <1111905181.4753.15.camel@mylaptop> <20050326224621.61f6d917.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111907130.4753.32.camel@mylaptop> <20050326235712.25f9ca36.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111911493.5824.12.camel@mylaptop> <4246FAD5.5080700@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:26:29 -0800
Mike Christie <michaelc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> reliable receive is ciritical for WRITEs. Even if the WRITE is executed
> successfully on the remote device, if we cannot receive the return status
> from the device the operation will fail at the iscsi driver side due to a
> SCSI timeout.

I keep hearing this word "reliable", it means something very
different for TCP over a transport like IP than it does
for the SCSI layer.

It is, in fact, the whole difficulty of implementing iSCSI:
being able to cope with this difference in expectations.

All I can see is that the SCSI layer's timeout is inappropriate
for something like iSCSI, not that TCP or networking needs
to change in some way.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>