netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events

To: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC: IPSEC patch 0 for netlink events
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:47:07 +1000
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1111864971.1092.904.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1111864971.1092.904.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 02:22:51PM -0500, jamal wrote:
>
> --- a/include/linux/xfrm.h    2005/03/26 18:30:26     1.1
> +++ b/include/linux/xfrm.h    2005/03/26 18:47:48
> @@ -254,5 +254,8 @@
>  
>  #define XFRMGRP_ACQUIRE              1
>  #define XFRMGRP_EXPIRE               2
> +#define XFRMGRP_POLEXPIRE    4
> +#define XFRMGRP_SA           8
> +#define XFRMGRP_POLICY               0x10

Since we're adding new multicast groups, what about adding one for
the passive event monitor? That way we can return ESRCH in km_query
if there are no registered ACQUIRE listeners but still send messages
to the monitor.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>