| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:23:38 +0100 |
| Cc: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shinta Sugimoto <shinta.sugimoto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050326005855.GA23533@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1111795927.1089.749.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050326003058.GA22930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111798470.1090.774.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050326005855.GA23533@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1 |
Herbert Xu wrote: On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 07:54:31PM -0500, jamal wrote:It seems that we dont support any acquires from userspace to kernelI haven't checked af_key but netlink does support that. All you have to do is send messages to the correct multicast group. Of course whether any of the KMs actually deal with it is a different story :) af_key implements the second part of RFC2367 §3.1.6, canceling an acquire request by sending an acquire message to the kernel with the same sequence number as the initial acquire request. It doesn't support the third part, acting as KM for userspace. Regards Patrick |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |