netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

from [Patrick McHardy] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:39:50 +0100
Cc: Andy Furniss <andy.furniss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Harald Welte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Remus <rmocius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Nguyen Dinh Nam <nguyendinhnam@xxxxxxxxx>, Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>, syrius.ml@xxxxxxxxxx, Damion de Soto <damion@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1111781443.1092.631.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1107123123.8021.80.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1110453757.1108.87.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <423B7BCB.10400@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111410890.1092.195.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <423F41AD.3010902@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111444869.1072.51.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <423F71C2.8040802@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111462263.1109.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42408998.5000202@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111550254.1089.21.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4241C478.5030309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111607112.1072.48.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4241D764.2030306@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111612042.1072.53.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4241F1D2.9050202@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4241F7F0.2010403@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111625608.1037.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <424212F7.10106@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111663947.1037.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111665450.1037.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4242DFB5.9040802@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111749220.1092.457.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42446DB2.9070809@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1111781443.1092.631.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1 
jamal wrote:

Things will work once the  "action track" is in place; i.e you would
then say:
"match xxx .. \
 action track \
 action connmark"


Thinking again, is it really necessary? Please look at the problem
and patch Phil Oester just posted, I would prefer if we could keep
conntrack out of areas with queues :)

Regards
Patrick
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, Patrick McHardy
Next by Date:  Re: PATCH: action stats double dip, Thomas Graf
Previous by Thread:  Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal
Next by Thread:  Re: iptables breakage WAS(Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]