[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS

To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 20 Mar 2005 13:43:45 -0500
Cc: Ludo Stellingwerff <ludo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <423DBF6A.1080907@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <20050314102614.GA9610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314105313.GA21001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314111002.GA29156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050315091904.GA6256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050315095837.GA7130@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050318090310.GA28443@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050318091129.GA28658@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050318104013.57d65e99.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <423D9ADA.6050407@xxxxxxxxx> <423DA58D.4050406@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050320171707.GE4201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <423DB7B7.1070604@xxxxxxxxx> <423DBCCE.8090006@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <423DBF6A.1080907@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 13:22, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Ludo Stellingwerff wrote:
> > I'm hoping that using the fwmark as a selector can provide a workable
> > solution for both mine and Lennert's problem, any many more related
> > situations. Netfilter has a (almost) complete range of selectors.
> > e.g. Lennerts problem could be solved using a combination of the
> > "realm" match of iptables, in combination with a fwmark for SPD matching.
> Routing of local packets is done before the first netfilter hook
> is called, but I forgot about ip_route_me_harder(). So you're right,
> the realm can be translated to nfmark values using iptables.

BTW, is there any reason the SPD couldnt have been implemented from day
one using netfilter classification ? Why did we need another speacilized
classifier? the actions are clearly implementable as targets.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>