Re: IPsec xfrm resolution

[Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 08:32:31PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:23:14 +1100
> Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 1) The application must be able to react to MTU changes anyway.
> 
> This would seem to be the case, but keep in mind that if
> we're going through all this trouble to improve this
> quality of implementation issue, we should really get this
> right.

Don't worry, further down in that thread we agreed that optional
SAs will simply not be added so the MTU estimate will be correct
unless it's changed by PMTU later on.
 
> Anyways, in truth I'm being very picky :-)  Is there any prototype
> or beginnings of these ideas anywhere?

Not yet.  However, once the MTU stuff is out of the way I would like
to work on this.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt