| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [15/*] [INET] Fix IPsec calculation in ip_append_data/ip6_append_data |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:02:54 -0800 |
| Cc: | kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050316113149.GA10960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050214221200.GA18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221433.GB18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221607.GC18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050306213214.7d8a143d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050307103536.GB7137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314102614.GA9610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314105313.GA21001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314111002.GA29156@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050315091904.GA6256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050316113149.GA10960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:31:49 +1100 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This patch is wrong. This is the *one* place where we do need to > use the path MTU. The reason is that when the packet is fragmented > we only pay for the IPsec overhead once over all and not once for > each fragment. > > Please revert it for now. Ok, done. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch linux-2.6.11-bk10 1/1] r8169: incoming frame length check, Francois Romieu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [BUG] overflow in net/ipv4/route.c rt_check_expire(), David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [15/*] [INET] Fix IPsec calculation in ip_append_data/ip6_append_data, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [15/*] [INET] Fix IPsec calculation in ip_append_data/ip6_append_data, Mika Penttilä |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |