| To: | "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:14:21 -0500 |
| Cc: | Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Adam K Kirchhoff <adamk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, prism54-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx, Feyd <feyd@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050316162448.GR17854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <422F118D.8070704@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050309160744.GN4017@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050309202718.4f94b871@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050310021724.GD17854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42302133.2060103@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050310103608.GB1416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050310163007.GK17854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050316162448.GR17854@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 |
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: Jeff/netdev, If no comment is given on how we should deal with pci_dma_sync_single/pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu for 2.4 I'm just going to put in a nasty ifdef there. Comemnts? For 2.4, why not define pci_dma_sync_single_for_{device,cpu} as equivalent to pci_dma_sync_single?
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 06/13] ppc 8260 fcc ethernet driver cannot read LXT971 PHY id, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.6 patch] fix bridge <-> ATM compile error, Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W, Luis R. Rodriguez |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W, Chris Wedgwood |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |