netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 12/13] pcnet32 79C975 fiber fix

To: Don Fry <brazilnut@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch 12/13] pcnet32 79C975 fiber fix
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:03:22 -0800
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, steven.hardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050316005630.GA9421@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200503152222.j2FMMiLB016826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050316005630.GA9421@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Don Fry <brazilnut@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I had not seen this problem until now.  The patch looks ok and
>  probably should have been written that way initially.  I have been
>  able to do a quick touch test with a 970A, 971, 972, 973, 975, 976, and
>  978 (some on ia32 and others on ppc64) without any adverse effects.
>  The 975 I have is copper not fiber.

Great, thanks.

>  Since only bit 12 is needed to enable LED writes, the code could
>  really be "a->write_bcr(ioaddr, 2, a->read_bcr(ioaddr, 2) | 0x1000);"
>  During pcnet32_open the ASEL bit is changed anyway.

OK, could you please prepare a final patch sometime and get it into Jeff? 
cc me as well please so I can update the patch I have.

>  This change should also be applied to 2.4.30 as well.

And that too, I guess.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>