Re: [3/4] [IPSEC] Add route element to xfrm_dst

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>]

Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> > Since the tunnel dst is not necessarily the last in the bundle anymore,
> > we might miss to initialize some dsts, for example with ipcomp/tunnel +
> > esp/transport. If we have nested tunnels we'll fiddle with entries in
> > the routing cache.
>
> Sorry, but I don't get it :) First of all what do you mean by the
> tunnel dst?
>
> If you mean &rt->u.dst then as far as I can see it's still the last
> child in the bundle.  It may also appear in ->route elements earlier
> on but that does not come into play in this loop.
You're right, I must have misread the code somehow. Sorry for the noise.

Regards
Patrick