[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More IPSEC trouble

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: More IPSEC trouble
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 03:35:46 +0100
Cc: Steve Hill <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050312013515.GA17539@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <E1D9Ymg-0001x0-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503111453320.18067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42323125.20706@xxxxxxxxx> <20050312013515.GA17539@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050106 Debian/1.7.5-1
Herbert Xu wrote:
Good catch.  However let's try to avoid spreading lock/unlock calls
around if possible.

Since tunnel_check_size only looks at the state to determine whether
it's tunnel mode, it doesn't need to hold the lock at all.

Agreed, your patch is better.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>