| To: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:43:04 -0800 |
| Cc: | vanco@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <422F8D84.8010103@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200503081900.18686.vanco@xxxxxxxx> <200503092217.01106.vanco@xxxxxxxx> <422F8649.8050707@xxxxxxxxx> <200503100050.05582.vanco@xxxxxxxx> <422F8D84.8010103@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:57:56 +0100 Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Will this patch be included in future kernels? > > I hope so. Dave, are you fine with making /proc more efficient than > netlink ? :) No objection :-) I'll hit this on my next pass over my 2.6.x backlog which should start tonight. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: ethtool -d no longer works for e1000, cramerj |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] r8169: auto detect 32-bit slot, Francois Romieu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps, Patrick McHardy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.11 on AMD64 traps, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |