| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping |
| From: | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:51:58 -0300 |
| Cc: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, baruch@xxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=NrF77u0Od6h6SUT0biLuU/NkOdo887hju75QRJesePewJe+jkJH1Bqv9q9xi4kprJJpPlhFMHMzbuLzS8u6ZuiZ1mzyhejGYGK5eVYD0AM41rZWimdvjXXyj7qu4nFERfBRqh/nrZoOMxmPex3xhFH+sjq67u5Aveam6g3XBiG8= |
| In-reply-to: | <20050308183759.GE31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050303123811.4d934249@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42278122.6000000@xxxxxxxxx> <20050303133659.0d224e61.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42278554.2090902@xxxxxxxxx> <20050303135718.2e1a0170.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <422DC7CE.2040800@xxxxxxxxx> <m1y8cykr7i.fsf@xxxxxx> <20050308100902.24b67b2f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050308181844.GA37392@xxxxxx> <20050308183759.GE31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 19:37:59 +0100, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Speaking of it, I see tcp_sock is marginal over 2**10 on 32 bit archs and > Stephen's plans to outsource the cc bits brings us closer to the border. > Would it be worth to try and get it below 2**10? I spotted some places > for optimizations but not enough to really save the needed amount. sk_protinfo, sk_slab, sk_zapped are going away when I finish my connection_sock-2.6 series. sk_protinfo isn't needed if all proto families use the sk_alloc + kmalloc, i.e. specifying the size of the proto specific socket (like tcp_sock) in "zero_it" and passing NULL in the slab parameter, like I did with bluetooth today and will do with the ham radio, the last ones using sk_protinfo. sk_slab will be get from only in sk->sk_prot->slab. sk_zapped was just a debugging member that got reused, and can be turned into a SOCK_ZAPPED in sk_flags. -- - Arnaldo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Henrik Nordstrom |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x net driver updates, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |