| To: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping |
| From: | Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:01:01 +0000 |
| Cc: | shemminger@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <m1y8cykr7i.fsf@xxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050303123811.4d934249@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42278122.6000000@xxxxxxxxx> <20050303133659.0d224e61.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42278554.2090902@xxxxxxxxx> <20050303135718.2e1a0170.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <422DC7CE.2040800@xxxxxxxxx> <m1y8cykr7i.fsf@xxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) |
Andi Kleen wrote: Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx> writes:I can squeeze the tcp_skb_cb to one pointer at the expense of extra work to remove a packet from the list (the other pointer is the prev pointer).You could also use a xor list in theory. But I'm not sure it's worth it. Increasing cb by 4 bytes shouldn't be a very big issue. If increasing the cb by 4 bytes is ok, it would make my life easier and the code simpler. But I don't think it would also be a big issue to remove the prev pointer. Now, if we can agree on increasing the tcp_sock by 20 bytes I'll be able to continue my work. Baruch |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [leo@xxxxxxxxx: [PATCH] ethernet-bridge: update skb->priority in case forwarded frame has VLAN-header], Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |