| To: | Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 08 Mar 2005 08:58:20 -0500 |
| Cc: | Zdenek Radouch <zdenek@xxxxxxx>, Steve Iribarne <steve.iribarne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eran Mann <emann@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050308135134.GA20607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <E1D7lQN-0002gz-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1D7lQN-0002gz-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1D7zBN-0004hX-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050306173145.GQ31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1D81mg-0002rz-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1y8d0mss2.fsf@xxxxxx> <3sp35g$7hpm0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <422C0B50.20500@xxxxxxx> <3sp35g$7rsc1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1110288879.1050.167.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050308135134.GA20607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 08:51, Martin Mares wrote: > Hello! > > > Seems to me you are relying on obscurity of 127.x to achieve goals which > > you could achieve just as easily with a 10.x address or even a public > > address. > > Using the same public block in all devices looks like the best solution. > People tend to use private blocks in a chasis (unique IP for each blade) - which by default are not routed outside the chasis. I have a feeling this is what you meant cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] neighbour tables configuration via rtnetlink, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Martin Mares |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Martin Mares |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |