netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [11/*] [NET] Move dst_release out of dst->ops->check

To: herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [11/*] [NET] Move dst_release out of dst->ops->check
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 06:50:46 -0600 (CST)
Cc: davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20050306213214.7d8a143d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050307103536.GB7137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 8 Mar 2005 
21:27:41 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:

> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:35:36PM +1100, herbert wrote:
> > 
> > Here's the patch to fix those two problems.  Yes I know
> > my dst_check implementation is lame.  I'll come back and
> > fix up all the dst_check functions by moving their dst_release
> > calls out.  It proves that you were right in that IPv6 dst
> > leak thread :)
> 
> As promised here is the patch that moves dst_release out of
> dst->ops->check.  It bloats sk_dst_check/__sk_dst_check slightly

I agree.

--yoshfuji

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>