| To: | herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [11/*] [NET] Move dst_release out of dst->ops->check |
| From: | YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 08 Mar 2005 06:50:46 -0600 (CST) |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | USAGI Project |
| References: | <20050306213214.7d8a143d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050307103536.GB7137@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
In article <20050308102741.GA23468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:27:41 +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:35:36PM +1100, herbert wrote: > > > > Here's the patch to fix those two problems. Yes I know > > my dst_check implementation is lame. I'll come back and > > fix up all the dst_check functions by moving their dst_release > > calls out. It proves that you were right in that IPv6 dst > > leak thread :) > > As promised here is the patch that moves dst_release out of > dst->ops->check. It bloats sk_dst_check/__sk_dst_check slightly I agree. --yoshfuji |
| Previous by Date: | [11/*] [NET] Move dst_release out of dst->ops->check, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [leo@xxxxxxxxx: [PATCH] ethernet-bridge: update skb->priority in case forwarded frame has VLAN-header], jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | [11/*] [NET] Move dst_release out of dst->ops->check, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [11/*] [NET] Move dst_release out of dst->ops->check, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |