[Top] [All Lists]

Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11

To: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: r8169: panic on 2.6.11
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 10:59:36 -0800
Cc: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050305003735.GE1148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Open Source Development Lab
References: <20050304132804.270cf05b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050304145317.772859da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050304230214.GC1148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200503041728.54026.jdmason@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050304154903.7b7e0fb1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050305003735.GE1148@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 01:37:35 +0100
Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> :
> [...]
> > Added this and took out "too much work at interrupt message"
> Ok (leaks but see below).
> > And got this (before it died):
> > 
> > eth0: status=803ff0 opts=803ff0 opts2=0 addr=0:106ad012
>                            ^^^^^^
> 3ff0 would be a ~16k packet. The high weight byte is
> missing: the descriptor would be strictly somewhere between
> the first descriptor and the last descriptor for the packet.
> opts=80xxxx -> FIFO overflow (*bulb flashes*)
> The code does not look pretty there.

Doesn't come up because it gets that bit set in the normal case.

eth0: Rx ERROR status=328440ff!!!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>