netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [5/*] [IPSEC] Use dst_mtu in xfrm[46]_output

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [5/*] [IPSEC] Use dst_mtu in xfrm[46]_output
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 21:33:33 -0800
Cc: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050216103744.GA476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050214221006.GA18415@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221200.GA18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221433.GB18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214221607.GC18465@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050216103744.GA476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:37:44 +1100
Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There was a lot of fun in laying the foundations.  Now it's time
> to start using it.
> 
> This patch fixes the calculations in xfrm[46]_output so that we don't
> reject properly sized packets from the TCP stack.  The previous
> calculation is wrong because the xfrm overhead is not constant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> After this I'll start cleaning stuff up.  For example, tcp's
> ext2_header_len and dst's path can both be removed.

Looks good, applied.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [5/*] [IPSEC] Use dst_mtu in xfrm[46]_output, David S. Miller <=