| To: | Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Still bug-hunting |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:57:12 +0100 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <422A0354.3080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4229F2EC.8090103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050305102918.15fd422c.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4229FC15.3070408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050305104854.45106335.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <422A0079.4080806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050305105706.2c8a6975.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <422A0354.3080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Christian Schmid <422A0354.3080800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-05 20:07 > Actually we are a company and the big ones decided to buy new servers to > work-around this bug. This is a common technique in companies. I say this > sucks and thats why I experienced in our production system in order to give > linux something back by reporting and helping to fix a bug which only > appears on big systems. I do not understand why you start flaming at me. It's quite simple, provide a test case and someone will start looking into the problem (given there is one). The information you provided so far is quite vague, it would be pure luck to spot the bug. You have do understand that looking into such a bug may cost dozens of hours or days if it can't be reproduced by the person. Nobody does this without at least very strong evidences that the bug actually exists and your appereance so far didn't help too much I guess. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [leo@xxxxxxxxx: [PATCH] ethernet-bridge: update skb->priority in case forwarded frame has VLAN-header], Ben Greear |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Still bug-hunting, Christian Schmid |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Still bug-hunting, Christian Schmid |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Still bug-hunting, Christian Schmid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |