| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping |
| From: | Jason Lunz <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:49:33 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization: | PBR Streetgang |
| References: | <20050303123811.4d934249@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303125556.6850cfe5.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1109884688.1090.282.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303132143.7eef517c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1109885065.1098.285.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303133237.5d64578f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303135416.0d6e7708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | slrn/0.9.8.1 (Debian) |
shemminger@xxxxxxxx said: >> We should eliminate the max backlog thing completely. There is >> no need for it. > > Still need some bound, because if process_backlog is running slower > than the net; then the queue could grow till memory exhausted from > skbuff's. yes. I eliminated netdev_max_backlog long ago in an experiment with a 2.4 kernel, and it became quite easy to consume huge amounts of kernel memory. Jason |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix deletion of local addresses only varying in prefix length, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Edgar E Iglesias |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |